When is Slower Block Propagation More Profitable for Large Miners?

Search for a command to run...

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Do you know that we have a team of scholar apes? Stay updated on the latest research findings and join us in geeking out over their fascinating discoveries!
Abstract The design of zkSNARKs is increasingly complicated and requires familiarity with a broad class of cryptographic and algebraic tools. This complexity in zkSNARK design also increases the difficulty in zkSNARK implementation, analysis, and opt...
🍨 Your weekly bite of the latest updates from the Bitcoin tech ecosystem!

🍨 不可错过的每周比特币技术生态速览

🍨 Your weekly bite of the latest updates from the Bitcoin tech ecosystem!

🍨 不可错过的每周比特币技术生态速览

🍨 Your weekly bite of the latest updates from the Bitcoin tech ecosystem!

For years, Bitcoin miners put little effort into adopting several widely-acclaimed block acceleration techniques, which, as some argued, would secure their revenues. Their indifference inspires a theory that slower block propagation is beneficial for some miners. In this study, we analyze and confirm this counterintuitive theory. Specifically, by modeling inadvertent slower blocks, we show that a mining coalition that controls more than a third of the total mining power can earn unfair revenue by propagating blocks slower to outsiders. Afterward, we explore the strategies of an attacker that consciously exploits this phenomenon. The results indicate that an attacker with 45% of the total mining power can earn 58% of the total revenue. This attack is alarming as it is equally fundamental but more stealthy than the well-known selfish mining attack. At last, we discuss its detection and defense mechanisms.
Read the full paper.
28th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, September 2023
Slow Block Attack, Selfish Mining
More papers from the authors:
Crystal: Enhancing Blockchain Mining Transparency with Quorum Certificate
Analysing and Improving Shard Allocation Protocols for Sharded Blockchains
General Congestion Attack on HTLC-Based Payment Channel Networks
NC-Max: Breaking the Security-Performance Tradeoff in Nakamoto Consensus
Lay Down the Common Metrics: Evaluating Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols' Security